Timeline for What is the point of closing a question that is asked, answered, got positive reception, and has an answer accepted by questioner?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
10 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Nov 25, 2017 at 4:19 | comment | added | SDsolar | This is a good reminder that when editing someone's question it is not fair to change the intent. Maybe clarify language, correct a title, add and/or remove tags. But it shouldn't be to take them off the rails and into the weeds. That being said, Google can still find answers regardless of whether the question is accurate. Remember, this is a database that is very visible to Google, and good answers are useful even when slightly off-topic. | |
Dec 21, 2014 at 14:38 | comment | added | user5 | @Roya I just want it to be clear that I was responding to the original question, not the edited one. I'll think about the added statements, and update if I have anything to add. Thanks for your concern. | |
Dec 21, 2014 at 7:27 | comment | added | Roya | Dear Sam, If you do not mind, please uupdate your answer to match the edited version of the question. Warm Regards, | |
Dec 21, 2014 at 3:56 | comment | added | user5 | @Roya What part do you disagree with? Do you think that question is on topic and shouldn't have been closed? If so, please move to re-open it, and let the community decide. | |
Dec 21, 2014 at 3:26 | comment | added | Roya | Dear Sam, With all do respect, I disagree with your answer in this case. Warm Regards, | |
Dec 20, 2014 at 20:05 | comment | added | user5 | Rolled back to the quote I was actually responding to to prevent the context from changing. | |
Dec 20, 2014 at 20:03 | history | rollback | user5 |
Rollback to Revision 1
|
|
Dec 20, 2014 at 13:22 | history | edited | Roya | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 49 characters in body
|
Dec 19, 2014 at 20:35 | history | edited | Roya | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 6 characters in body
|
Dec 18, 2014 at 19:28 | history | answered | user5 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |